General Enquiries

+44 (0) 191 217 0775

Media Enquiries Gravity London

+44 (0) 20 7330 8810

Fax Us

+44 (0) 191 236 2709

Write to us

Credit Services Association

2 Esh Plaza

Sir Bobby Robson Way

Great Park

Newcastle Upon Tyne

NE13 9BA

Additional Sections

Complaints Procedure

Useful Links

Making a complaint

We work hard to ensure our Members act within the rules set by the industry regulators.

Please click on the following link and read our Code of Practice. If you think a Member has broken the rules of this Code you can make a complaint by downloading our Complaints Form.

Before making a complaint we would encourage you to carry out the following activities:


  • Go to the Members Directory and check whether the company you wish to complain about is a Member of the CSA. If you are still unsure, feel free to contact us. If the company is a Member of the CSA then we are able to help you with your complaint.
  • On first instance, we recommend you contact the Member company to discuss any issues you have and enquire about their complaints process. If you are still dissatisfied with the outcome then you can review our Complaints Procedure.
  • If you believe that the Member has acted in breach of our Code of Practice and the complaint meets the necessary criteria, please complete, sign and return the Complaint Form to our registered address.

CSA Complaints Procedure

 How we deal with your complaint.

All complaints must be submitted in writing, with a signed complaint form. We require the form to be signed so that we, and our Member, have the requisite authorisation to share information.

The following is the sequence of events after the CSA receive a complaint form;

  • CSA receive a signed complaint form
  • CSA register the complaint and send a copy to the relevant Member company
  • The Member is given four weeks to respond directly to the complainant
  • CSA get a copy of the response from the Member company
  • CSA considers both positions and determines whether the Code of Practice has been breached
  • Appropriate action is taken (if required) to remedy the situation
  • If further information is required the CSA contact the relevant party (the complainant or the Member company).
  • After a full review, the CSA provides a formal response to the complainant


If you remain unhappy with the outcome of the complaint, you may have justification to escalate the matter to our our head of compliance, Claire Aynsley,


Please note: The CSA can only intervene when;

  • a Member company is in breach of the Code.
  • the company is a Member of the CSA (we cannot act when the complaint is about the client of a Member company, a bank or building society for example).
  • the information supplied by a Member company appears from the facts to be incorrect.

Methods of Contact



Credit Services Association

Complaints Department

2 Esh Plaza

Sir Bobby Robson Way


NE13 9BA


Why the CSA need a signed copy of your complaint




Marginal gains - DGI data, Q2 2015

John Ricketts, Vice President of the Credit Services Association (CSA), says that the industry should be looking to learn from the concept of ‘marginal gains’.
Sir Dave Brailsford CBE, the former director of British Cycling, was among the first to coin the phrase ‘the aggregation of marginal gains’ to describe his approach to developing performance. Put simply, it is the notion of how small improvements in a number of different aspects of what we do can have a huge impact to the overall improvement of a team or business. It might also be applied to our own industry as it looks to tackle key challenges around consolidation, Treating Customers Fairly (TCF),
and managing complaints.
Debt buyers, the ‘stars’ of the credit services industry in many ways, have enjoyed considerable success in recent times. They have been perhaps more remarkable – in the true sense of the word – in expanding their businesses and acquiring portfolios that have seen the debt sale and purchase sector within our industry rise to prominence.
But for the first time since the Credit Services Association’s Data Gathering Initiative (DGI) reported in 2012, Debt owned by debt buyers has seen a sudden and marked drop. Having previously recorded steady and regular quarter on quarter growth, in Q2 2015 debt owned stood at £52.3 billion against £56.4 billion in Q1 2015, a drop of some £4.2bn (or seven percent). This returns debt owned back to a level last seen in Q1 2014.
There may be several reasons for this: it could imply that whilst some debt buyers are clearly growing, as a sector debt buyer collections and debt written off are outstripping purchases for the first time. Whilst the fall is considerable, there is certainly no cause for alarm: when put into context this figure still represents a 16 percent increase over the same period in Q2 2013 when debt owned stood at £45.1 billion.
Falling figures
While the figures for debt owned have fallen, so too have the figures for debt held by Debt Collection Agencies (DCA’s) for collection, though at a much slower pace than we have seen over the last three quarters. The statistics suggest that DCA placements have found their new level following an extended period of pressure on market share.
In Q2 2015, placements to DCA's were £26.5 billion, down only one percent on Q1 2015 at £26.8 billion. However, this number was supported by an increase in debt outsourced by the debt buyers to DCA's that has risen by three percent (or £454 million) over last quarter. Starkly, DCA's have seen 29 percent of their market share of debt held for collection disappear since Q2 2013 (nine percent in the last year).
As a result of the drop in debt held by the debt buyers, overall (once we net off the debt outsourced to DCA's by the debt buyers so as not to double count) debt held for collection by CSA members has fallen from £69.4 billion in Q1 2015 to £64.3 billion in Q2 2015 - a drop of some seven percent.
So much for the money held, but what about the volumes and values of debt collected? Collections by DCA's have continued to hold firm after two prior quarters of successive growth, once again demonstrating the resilience of DCA's against a backdrop of reducing placements (albeit at a much slowed pace), the withdrawal of paying accounts, panel consolidation and the challenges of working in a newly regulated environment. Collections for Q2 2015 were £469 million compared to £471 million in Q1 2015 and still reflecting of level of collections last seen in 2013.
In-house collections by debt buyers are performing especially well; they currently stand at £306 million for Q2 2015 compared to £260 million in Q1 2015. This continues the growth seen in Q1 2015 and represents an 18 percent growth over the last quarter, a 38 percent growth over the same period last year, and an amazing 59 percent growth over the same period two years ago, demonstrating how far the debt purchase industry has grown in recent years.
Interestingly, whilst the number of revenue generating collections staff has remained relatively flat for another quarter (at 6,039 agents compared to 6,078 in Q1 2015), the DGI is showing another spike in non-revenue generating back office/compliance staff (up from 4,880 in Q1 2015 to 5,203 in Q2 2015). This seven percent growth of 323 takes the back office/compliance staffing figure to its highest ever percentage level of total staffing (at 46 percent) and the highest level since DGI records began. This is an enormous 15 percent increase over Q2 2013. Correspondingly, revenue generating collection agents have fallen by nine percent over the same two-year period, down from 6,623 to 6,039.
Upheld complaints
The number of upheld complaints has again grown, albeit modestly - up three percent at 3,468 in Q2 2015 compared to 3,351 in Q1 2015. This is an increase of 21 percent over the same period last year in Q2 2014 when upheld complaints stood at 2,856 and a 50 percent increase over the same period two years ago in Q2 2013 when upheld complaints were 2,312.
Whilst some may take a sharp intake of breath at these stats, it is worth noting that the industry is now being measured against a new standard, and CSA members have become better at identifying, recognising and recording when a customer has not been treated as well as they should. Agencies have undoubtedly ‘upped their game’ in this area, evidenced by the investment in rising numbers of back office and compliance staff. As an industry, we continue to generate a mere fraction of complaints as a proportion of the number of cases we handle, so any rise should be seen in this context as well as an indication of our willingness to learn, develop and benefit from the resulting marginal gains. After all, if you never recognise a mistake, you never make a discovery.